Copyright: fewer and fewer employees behind ornate? _haoqian

Financial times, the pink of the century-old reported in Chinese audience through its Chinese network would be played well and rake in a lot of readers. But behind the glitz, the United Kingdom this part newspaper internal thrift expenditure is producing a certain "unpleasant", of course, in the United Kingdom is sweeping the nation's media thrifty spending trend, the financial times is only one, not the exception. (The following more description translation since last December, the United Kingdom local national press Union official release information, do not represent my views) in years on collecting and editing team of the reduced financial times reporters are experiencing unprecedented pressure. National Press Union already in December 23, initiated the revolt, they hope to more management seriously their worries. This one, as national press Union of journalists in writing to the financial times management letter said: "over the past four years, there are two important factors is changing the financial times: first, the new technology; second, the fewer staff. "" Course, a new technology for all journalists who are exciting things, technology can enhance and millions of readers the ability to communicate with the audience, which is why the financial times and the financial times website (ft.com) growth, while the technology also makes available the information-rich and diverse. "" At the same time, new technology means for content more demand — certainly not just through different forms display the same content. " This is financial times reporters think they need more reporters and editors, and production team. Behind the new technology, they think journalists should be more — and now, on the contrary, it is compressed and editing team has to "skinny". On December 23, there is a pressure level of investigation is also in progress, the theme is to measure the number of sparse staff to reporters health risks. However, no doubt, the financial times is a company that has specialized in the media, but is not a "quality" also need editing input equivalent may be ? now looks, financial times press continues to be maintained for the normal operation of the media, but perhaps partly due to the company employees for their work, their pride in themselves and higher requirements. But if the reference to safety, as well as professional level, it seems increasingly sparse staff and is a "professional".